Skip to main content

From Hunters and Gatherers to Peasant Society: Part II

The hunters and gatherers are also called as nomads or nomadic tribes. This is because they moved around different places in search of food. their main occupation was hunting for their tribesmen (or the members in their tribe) and gathering food material. In other words, the hunters and gatherers lived by exploiting the natural resources. Gerhard Lenski, in his book Human Societies (1970), stated that hunting and gathering society is the oldest and simplest type of society. They spent a nomadic way of life and used very primitive technology for the purpose of hunting and gathering. Important tools like axes, knives, using stone for fire are some of the simplest technology which have been used by the hunters and gatherers. For example, the San people of Kalahari desert in Southern Africa, Aranda tribe of the Central Asian desert are some of the examples of such societies. 

      Some of the important characteristic features of the hunting and gathering society are as follows:
      The hunting and gathering societies are very small in size and they lived in a scattered away (spread away or settled away in far distances). This is because the natural resources where they had lived could not support a large number of people at one time. For small size groups it was easy for the people to search sufficient food for their tribe members. They had mostly spent a nomadic way of life. This means that they were never settled in one place for a long time. They have always moved from one place to the other in search of more food. When natural resources in one place would come to an end they moved to other places. Also they used to move away from danger of being attacked by dangerous animals and other tribesmen. 
       The most important duty and function which was to be fulfilled by the hunters and gatherers was to gather food for their tribesmen and share them collectively. There was no form of wealth which they could acquire. Thus they did not have the desire to acquire any form of wealth or acquire any form of property. There was also no form of competition among the tribesmen. Sharing is considered an important function and norm in the hunting and gathering society. If the head of the tribe or the clan catches any animal then it is divided among the rest of the people in the tribe. 
       Like there was no greed for wealth. There was also greed for power and authority over others. There was no formal political institution. If any wrong was done by any tribesman then a group decision was taken over punishment of the individual. Like Durkheim has stated in his account, Elementary Forms of Religious Life, among the Arunta tribe, there were repressive laws which were mostly created by the eldest member in the tribes and were followed by all the people. Similarly, there was no existence of division of labour. The concept of division of labour did not at all exist in these societies because there was no form of labour or capital production involved. The tribe or the clan worked collectively and there was no distinction in the level of work. Again like Durkheim and Malinowski had mentioned, the religion followed by the hunters and gatherers is most simple in nature. This is the simplistic form of religious life where the people did not worship Gods and Goddesses. They worshipped only plants and animals whom some of them also considered as totems or symbols of collective life. 
        The most important institution which they followed was the institution of family and kinship. The entire tribe worked as one family and their existences revolved around the kinship ties. All the members were connected through common ancestors and through marriage. Educating the young and feeding them was the sole responsibility of the family. This was not performed by any other institution. The entire society was formed of one big family or one kinship tie. There were no individual families functioning as distinct units within the society. This was one of the most important characteristic features of the hunting and gathering society.  

Comments

  1. Ma'am Ami bujhechi. Ar notes ta copy korao hoye geche.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Growth vs Development- ENGLISH

  Economic growth is the increase in goods & services produced by an economy or nation, considered for a specific period of time. The rise in the country’s output of goods and services is steady and constant and may be caused by an improvement in the quality of education, improvements in technology, or in any way if there is value addition in goods and services which is produced by every sector of the economy. It can be measured as a percentage increase in real gross domestic product. Where a gross domestic product (GDP) is adjusted by inflation. GDP is the market value of final goods & services which is produced in an economy or nation. Economic Development is the process focusing on both qualitative and quantitative growth of the economy. It measures all the aspects which include people in a country become wealthier, healthier, better educated, and have greater access to good quality housing. Economic Development can create more opportunities in the sectors of education, ...

Peasant Movements: Part II, The Pabna Rebellion

Pabna Rebellion 1873: The Pabna Rebellion took place in 1873 in Serajgunj sub-division of Pabna district in East Bengal (present Bangladesh) . This rebellion resulted in the introduction of many Acts to create a new form of land ownership system. During this period in many parts of Bengal, there was a new class of cultivators who were trying to rise up to the position of being big landlords or zamindars. The existing local landlords or zamindars had a problem in this rise of the new cultivator class. The Bengal Rent Act X of 1859 provided legal rights of occupying land to the new class of cultivators. However, since the existing zamindars did not want the new class of cultivators to get any form of legal right to occupy land for cultivation, they tried to lease land (or to give out land in rent) and created many levels of tenants. Tenants refers to the small and medium peasants who take land from the local zamindars for cultivation and they have to pay a fixed rent or tax to the zami...

VILLAGE COMMUNITY : FEATURES AND TYPES

  Classification of Villages: 4 Categories I. On the Basis of Structure: Structurally villages in India can be divided into following types: 1. The Nucleated Village: This is a common pattern of settlement mostly discernible in paddy growing areas. In this type of village, homes of farmers and artisans are clustered together. ADVERTISEMENTS: Their land is located outside the village at varying distance. Their livestock are often housed along with them or nearby them. This type of villages are characterised by residential proximity, neighbourhood, community feeling etc. 2.  The Linear Village: In this type of village, houses are built on parallel rows. Each house is surrounded by small gardens. The paddy fields are at a distance from the house. This pattern of settlement unites the social advantage of residential closeness and economic advantages of living on one’s land. 3.  Dispersed Village: The village in which the dwelling places of the village lay scattered or diffuse...